A Classical View: Why Do habitancy Commit Crimes?
People commit crimes because that is what they want to do. Criminal behavior is a matter of choices. Today, there are many excuses cloaked as reasons for criminal behavior. The misguided nature of these assertions has a serious impact upon crime control strategies. The classical advent to crime control strategies deals with direct intervention tactics. Law enforcement, within this rubric, takes an aggressive posture toward criminal acts. The delayed tactics of a reactionary position is relegated to the illusion of rehabilitation. In the classical view, deviance and crime are addressed in a proactive manner. This strives to be consistent with both legal and group aspects of constraint. Deviant behavior in the form of criminal action must necessitate a punitive advent to behavior. Such an advent must come with speed, precision and certainty. For control sanctions to work, the systems of justice must work decisively. The attendant criminal justice systems must be capable of deploying the principal resources. From an historic perspective, the classical school of criminology is often overlooked as a viable crime arresting strategy.
Child Support Help
All available scientific, forensic and technical resources should press full force behind a more classical advent to criminology. This endeavor should be applied within the context of contemporary times. Following a doctrine of "psychological hedonism", the classical advent holds that habitancy pick freely among alternatives of behavior. In this view, the perpetrator plans his or her criminal behavior before carrying out his or her actions. The private creates the basis for their departure from socially, morally or legally sanctioned aspects of behavior. A person calculates the "pain versus the delight of an act", or the gain minus the risk of doing a sure thing. Not unlike the rest of us, the perpetrator carries out his or her guide as a corollary of personal calculations. Such acts of deviance stem from the delight being greater than the risk. In other words, they want to take something that person else has. Criminals want the shortest length in the middle of two points. The implication of the doctrine is that the societal reaction to crime should be the supervision of a measured estimate of pain. The normal proposition of the classical school is that it is principal to make undesirable acts painful. Attaching punishment is crucial to making an impact on behavior. Likewise, punishment requires re-education, so that criminals learn straight through painful high-priced consequence such behavior is counterproductive.
Accountability and responsibility are attached in exact ways, so the perceived loss will exceed the gain. Since the punishment must be one that can be calculated, it must be the same for all individuals. No one is excused regardless of age, mentality, group or economic status, political work on or other self-indulgent conditions. habitancy are held in absolute responsibility to the actions they choose. Deterrence and moral retribution replace rehabilitation. Preventing criminal behavior before it happens is part of the wide strategy of crime control objectives. This perspective presupposes that habitancy will take advantage of opportunities. Since habitancy freely resolve their procedure of conduct, rapid societal interdiction is necessary. A concept of "free-will" criminology is principal to ensure society does not disintegrate due to an obsession with behavioral excuses. Behavior is influenced by a decision-making process that relies on consequences. As such, so is criminal behavior.
The motivation to commit acts of criminal behavior recite to basic internal desires of control, dominance, anger, revenge and display of personally perceived inadequacy. A quadrangle of self-motivated thinking transpires. Desire, opportunity, quality and gain merge to formulate the strategy of motivation. A multi-dimensional realm within the mind transforms into an outer expression of exploitation. As such, our crime control strategies and tactics must consider the inherent motivation of the criminal. The inherent motivation is the subjugation of someone else person for personal gain. Approaches based on hasty generalizations and politically exact agendas are counterproductive to the health, protection and welfare of the community. We must consider what the private criminal is like. He or she is not much distinct than the rest of us. Except that the criminal prefers "the short cut" in stead of the legitimate way of doing things. Forget about the pseudo-scientific approaches that come up with impressive labels and complex diagnoses. And, forget about the short-term fads or fetishes of quick fixes for long-term problems. Fancy theoretical constructs do not solve crime. Instead, thought about and dedicated hard working police officers do. They are the ones who solve criminal behavior issues affecting society. They do this straight through the group interaction of group reserve and involvement. Not by politicians, media hype, fad or fiction.
People commit crimes as part of a selfish desire to get something for nothing. Their "private logic" focuses on their alleged "suffering" at the hands of an insensitive and cruel world. They selfishly desire to take advantage of opportunities, exploit their prurient interests, and contend their abilities. All this is done based on their private capabilities to get what they think is rightfully theirs. The criminal is not a victim of society. Neither is he or she forced into a position of disadvantage by others. Criminals refuse to accept responsibility and responsibility for their behavior. When caught, they are quick to puppet excuses the group sciences, the media and politicians have preconceived for them. Criminals form their thinking processes on the basis of "being owed" something. His or her behavior becomes linked to what they believe is "entitlement".
Personal choice dominates the motives of private actions. We think, we fantasize and we act agreeing to our basic reliance system. straight through a process of rational known thought, we select the temptations of preference. Regardless of what comes into us from external sources, we pick what we want. We hire our learning history to do things we conjure in our own minds. Such is the rational process by which we pick and select the procedure of action we take. In a kind of "economic view" of the world, habitancy balance the risks, or the costs, complex in doing a sure act. Upon validation that the "benefit" outweighs the cost, we resolve to act. Then again, we might resolve not to act. Crime, in a sense, holds a seductive quality and grips our attention. We are mesmerized by the darkness in the balance in the middle of good and evil. Good and evil is naturally photograph thinking about the scope of human nature. For some, crime pays, until caught. At the very least, we hypothesize a "pain versus pleasure" reality.
References:
1. Jeffery, C. R., Crime arresting straight through Environmental Design, (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1971), page 24;
2. Samenow, E. S., Inside the Criminal Mind, (New York: Crown Business, 1984), pgs. 20-22;
3. Schmalleger, F., Criminology Today - An Integrative Introduction - Fourth Edition, (Upper Saddle River: Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2006), page 118-119;
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น